CORNEAL DENSITOMETRY CHANGES IN CONTACT LENS WEARERS
Document Type : Original articles: include clinical trials, interventional research, Basic researches and clinically relevant laboratory investigations
Purpose: Our study aims at evaluating corneal densitometry values among subjects who use soft contact lenses regularly. Methods: Prospective, observational study with a total of 32 eyes of 16 subjects regularly use soft contact lenses (group 1) and 32 obtained from 16 participants who do not wear contact lenses as a control group (group 2) were enrolled in the study to evaluate corneal densitometry by the Scheimpflug corneal topography (Pentacam; Oculus Inc., Wetzlar, Germany). We divide the corneal area, totaling 12 mm, for densitometry studying into 4 annular regions (from 0 to 2, from 2 to 6, from 6 to 10, and from 10 to 12 mm), as well as 3 posterior, central, and anterior regions. Results: The mean duration of wearing soft contact lenses amounted to 6 ± 2.5 years in group 1. Regarding the values of corneal densitometry, they were dramatically higher in the anterior 0- to 2- and 2- to 6- and 6-10 mm in group 1 when making comparisons with group 2 (20.7 ± 1.55 concerning group 1 and 17.38 ± 0.63 concerning group 2 [P <0.001]; 20.08 ± 1.51 for group 1 and 16.88 ± 0.53 <0.001 for group 2 [P<0.001], respectively). They were 8.82 ± 1.12 for group 1 and 16.47 ± 0.48 for group 2 p <0.001 in 6- to 10- mm. The difference between the 2 groups in the values of densitometry at 10- to 12 mm was insignificant (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Our results concluded that the densitometry of the cornea could be higher in the central 0- to 10-mm of the anterior region. Corneal densitometry in persons who regularly wear contact lenses, although the cornea may remain transparent.
S., A., H., R. (2025). 'CORNEAL DENSITOMETRY CHANGES IN CONTACT LENS WEARERS', Egyptian Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology, 8(1), pp. 27-31. doi: 10.21608/ejco.2025.443636
VANCOUVER
S., A., H., R. CORNEAL DENSITOMETRY CHANGES IN CONTACT LENS WEARERS. Egyptian Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology, 2025; 8(1): 27-31. doi: 10.21608/ejco.2025.443636